Welle v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
| Dana M Welle |
| Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 5:2012cv03016 |
| June 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 46 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
45
Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 43 Discovery Letter Brief.(kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 31 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal without prejudice; denying 32 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal without prejudice. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
41
Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 30 Discovery Letter Brief.(kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Continue Non-Expert and Expert Discovery Cut-Off Dates; (Proposed) Order filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/10/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting in part and denying in part 27 Discovery Letter Brief (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/4/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 10/5/12 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company Case Management Statement due by 9/28/2012. Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/30/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2012)
|
|
Filing
15
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 8/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Welle v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Keiko Kojima |
| Represented By: | Daniel William Maguire, Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dana M Welle | |
| Represented By: | Michael B. Horrow |
| Represented By: | Jason Alan Cole |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
