Morrow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Eva Morrow |
| Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 3:2012cv03045 |
| June 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER declining to rule of Defendants' pending motion to dismiss and REMANDING action back to Alameda County Superior Court. The court declines to rule on Wells Fargo and Cal-Western's motion to dismiss or Wells Fargo's motion to expu nge a lis pendens and instead REMANDS this action back to Alameda County Superior Court. The November 15, 2012 hearing is VACATED. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/9/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER regarding the service of Defendant Cal-Western and setting hearing on Defendant Wells Fargo's motions. Ms. Morrow shall file a proof of Cal-Western's service no later than October 12, 2012. Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss and motion to expunge a lis pendens is set for hearing on November 1, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/22/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
