Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Samsung Electronic Co., LTD et al
Plaintiff: Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC and Patriot Scientific Corporation
Defendant: Samsung Electronic Co., LTD and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv03877
Filed: July 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND DENYING MOTIONS TO COMPEL by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting-in-part 58 ( 83 ); denying 62 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2015)
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RELATING CASES Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 15, 2014. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER OF REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/24/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 9 Motion to Stay (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2012)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Lucy H. Koh. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/24/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. Samsung Electronic Co., LTD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Technology Properties Limited LLC
Represented By: Michelle Gail Breit
Represented By: Charles T. Hoge
Represented By: James Carl Otteson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC
Represented By: Michelle Gail Breit
Represented By: Charles T. Hoge
Represented By: James Carl Otteson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patriot Scientific Corporation
Represented By: Michelle Gail Breit
Represented By: Charles T. Hoge
Represented By: James Carl Otteson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronic Co., LTD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?