McBride et al v. First California Mortgage Company et al
| Concetta McBride and Gregory S. McBride |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. (MERS), Aurora Servicing Company, First California Mortgage Company, Luminent Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-6 and HSBC Bank, N.A. |
| 5:2012cv04054 |
| August 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Monterey |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/1/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2013)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/30/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED PROPERLY. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/30/2013 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 5/24/2013.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/26/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 10/4/2012 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/19/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER by Judge Seeborg Re 11 Motion for TRO (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
