Crump
Plaintiff: Steve Crump
Defendant: M. Gordon and Gregory Ahern
Case Number: 3:2012cv04357
Filed: August 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: PSLC CET
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 83 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 80 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT filed by M. Gordon. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/12/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015)
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 76 Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case Settled. Telephonic status conference set for 1/13/15 at 1:00 pm. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 12/5/14. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)
November 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER Telephonic Status Conference reset for 12/2/2014 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas. Signed by Judge Nandor Vadas on 11/10/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 62 Regarding Defendant M. Gordon's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Steve Crump, Motions terminated: 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by M. Gordon, 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Defendant M. Gordon's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Steve Crump.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/7/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2014)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 58 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extending Deadline to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Steve Crump. Opposition due 11/7/14. Reply due 11/14/14. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/29/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2014)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 53 Amended Complaint filed by Steve Crump. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014)
July 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/10/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued for presence of Plaintiff at settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Vadas on 4/1/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Crump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Ahern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?