Datatech Enterprises, LLC v. FF Magnat Limited et al
| Datatech Enterprises, LLC |
| FF Magnat Limited, Stanislav Davidoglov and John Doe |
| 3:2012cv04500 |
| August 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Charles R. Breyer |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER OF DISMISSAL (60 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/8/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 64 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 70 Motion for Relief from Preliminary Injunction ; denying 77 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/8/2013. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT EME. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/6/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 85 Motion to Continue; denying 85 Motion to Stay. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER RE ATTENDANCE AT ENE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/14/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013).
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 73 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings, 64 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ., Response to MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction due by 2/22/2013. Replies due by 3/1/2013. Motion Hearing set for 3/8/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/28/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 52 Motion for partial relief; denying as moot 53 Motion to shorten time. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 38 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
35
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and order granting motions for early discovery 18 and alternative service 17 . Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/14/2012. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER EXTENDING TRO BY STIPULATION OF PARTIES. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/11/2012. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 20 MOTION to Shorten Time TO HEAR PLAINTIFF DATATECH ENTERPRISES, LLCS MOTIONS FOR ORDER PERMITTING ALTERNATIVE SERVICE AND FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26 CONFERENCE filed by Datatech Enterprises. Reset Dea dlines as to 18 MOTION for Order Granting Leave to Take Discovery prior to Rule 26 Conference; 17 MOTION Order Permiting Alternative Service . Motions terminated: moot as to 13 MOTION to Shorten Time to Hear Defendant FF Magnat Limited's Motion for Partial Relief from TRO filed by FF Magnat Limited. Responses due by 9/7/2012. Replies due by 9/10/2012. Motion Hearing set for 9/11/2012 10:00 AM before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/4/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 2 Motion for TRO. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
