Walia v. Boothapuri et al
Plaintiff: Gurinder Walia
Defendant: Venkatesh Boothapuri and Arunachalam Thenappan
Case Number: 3:2012cv04660
Filed: September 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D. Laporte
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens, denying as moot: 47 Motion to Dismiss; 48 Motion to Dismiss; 59 Motion to Disqualify Counsel; 70 Motion to Dismiss; 71 Motion to Dismiss; 76 Motion to Strike; 77 Motion to Strike; 108 Motion to Strike. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2014)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER granting 100 MOTION to Continue Hearing Date filed by Arunachalam Thenappan, et al. Reset Deadlines as to 47 MOTION to Dismiss 12(b)(3), 49 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens, 76 MOTION to Strike 74 Declaration in Support, , 59 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel , 77 MOTION to Strike 75 Declaration in Opposition, , 71 MOTION to Dismiss 12 (b) (6), 70 MOTION to Dismiss 12 (b) (3 ), 48 MOTION to Dismiss 12(b)(6). Submission of authenticated records due by 12/16/2013. Response due by 1/7/2014. Motion Hearing reset for 1/24/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/31/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2013)
July 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/15/2013. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2013)
July 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/1/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
February 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Reset Deadlines as to 19 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint per FRCP 12(b)(6), 18 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint per FRCP 12(b)(3)., Motions Hearing s et for 3/29/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/2/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walia v. Boothapuri et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gurinder Walia
Represented By: Harmeet K. Dhillon
Represented By: Nitoj Paul Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Venkatesh Boothapuri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arunachalam Thenappan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?