Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers Welfare Plan et al v. Sefeco Door & Hardware, Inc.
| District Council 16 Northern California Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Plan, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund, Douglas Christopher, John Maggiore, Marian Bourboulis, I.U.P.A.T. Union & Industry National Pension Fund, James Williams, District Council No. 16, International Union of Painters & Allied Trades and Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal & Glass Workers Welfare Plan |
| Sefeco Door & Hardware, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv04685 |
| September 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Susan Illston |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER granting request to vacate case management conference. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/5/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
9
JUDGE ILLSTON'S STANDING ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2012)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Susan Illston. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/14/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
