Wittenberg v. Expedia, Inc. et al
| Amy Wittenberg |
| Trump International Hotels Management, LLC, Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC, InterContinental Hotels Group Resources, Inc., Sabre Holdings Corporation, Priceline.Com Incorporated, Booking.com B.V., Booking.com (USA), Inc., Orbitz Worldwide, Inc., Hilton Worldwide Inc., Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., Marriott International, Inc., Expedia, Inc., Hotels.com LP and Travelocity.com LP |
| 3:2012cv04754 |
| September 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER RELATING CASE. Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge (JSW)immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be res cheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/17/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
