Sidibe v. Sutter Health
Plaintiff: Djeneba Sidibe
Defendant: Sutter Health
Case Number: 3:2012cv04854
Filed: September 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1531 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTIONS. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 3/11/2022)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1193 ORDER.In the attached order, the court resolves the legal questions about the jury instructions as follows: (1) health plans are not purchasers as a matter of law; (2) business justifications are relevant only to the rule-of-reason claim, not t he tying claim; (3) market power is a necessary element for both the rule-of-reason and tying claims; and (4) the jury will be instructed with the standard CACI instruction (and not with the plaintiffs' proposed burden-shifting instruction). The court will separately post proposed final jury instructions and a proposed verdict form that are consistent with this order. Those will be discussed at a charging conference during trial. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1167 FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER. The court issues the attached pretrial order, which addresses the motions in limine. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 08/30/2021. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2021)
August 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1163 ORDER.In the attached order, the court denies the plaintiffs' request to issue a supplemental notice to class members in four counties in part because the counties are not part of the class and in part because of the one-way intervention rule. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/28/2021)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1038 ORDER. In the attached case-management order, the court provides guidance regarding sealing procedures to be followed for trial evidence. (lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2021)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 968 Discovery Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. In the attached order, the court addresses the parties' discovery dispute at ECF No. 967. (lblc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 962 Order.In the attached order, the court grants Sutter's motion for summary judgment for 2008 to 2010 and for the section 2 claims and otherwise denies the motion.(lblc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2021)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 823 ORDER CERTIFYING RULE 23(B)(3) CLASS. In the attached order, The court grants the plaintiffs' motion to certify a Rule 23(b)(3) damages class, except that it denies the motion for the period from 2008 to 2010 (a period that precedes MLR data). The court denies Sutter's motion for sanctions. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 714 ORDER re 698 Order re Motion for Class Certification.The court issues this redacted version of its August 30, 2019 order granting the plaintiffs' motion to certify their proposed class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) an d denying without prejudice their motion to certify their proposed class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). (This version also makes non-substantive changes to re-insert an inadvertently omitted word at 47:18 and to update the citations to Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp. at 51–52 from Westlaw citations to F.3d citations.) Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 678 ORDER re 673 Order re Motion for Summary Judgment.The court issues this redacted version of its April 12, 2019 order granting summary judgment with respect to the Davis HSA candidate Tying Market and otherwise denying Sutter's motio n for summary judgment, denying in part and denying as moot in part Sutter's motion to exclude Dr. Chipty, and denying as moot the plaintiffs' motion to exclude Dr. Gowrisankaran. (This version also makes one non-substantive change to fix a typo in the last sentence of the order.) Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2019)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 402 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler denying without prejudice 392 Motion to Quash; terminating 401 Stipulation. As set forth in the attached order, the court denies the motion without prejudice and orders the parties to comply with the disp ute procedures in the undersigned's standing order. The parties should first meet and confer and, if they are unable to resolve their dispute, may submit a joint letter brief, in accordance with the court's standing order. (For clarificatio n, for the purposes of third-party subpoenas and discovery disputes, the court's standing order's instructions to "parties" is meant to refer to the participants in a third-party discovery dispute, even if they are not formal parties to the underlying litigation.) The parties' stipulation regarding a briefing schedule for the motion to quash is terminated as moot. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2018)
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 234 Discovery Order adjudicating privilege disputes re 216 , 217 , 225 , 226 , 229 . As set forth in the attached order, the court has reviewed the documents that Sutter Health has submitted in camera and finds that some of them are covered by t he attorney-client privilege and/or protected from disclosure under the work-product doctrine, and that some of them are not. The court orders Sutter to produce the non-privileged/protected documents or portions thereof to the plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on February 7, 2018. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2018)
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 202 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER GRANTING SUTTER HEALTH'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Granting 70 Motion to Dismiss. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)
November 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 40 Motion to Dismiss.(lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013)
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Amended Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 15 Motion to Dismiss and amending 34 (signature line only). Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 6/3/2013. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 15 Motion to Dismiss.(lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sidibe v. Sutter Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Djeneba Sidibe
Represented By: Azra Z. Mehdi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sutter Health
Represented By: Lin Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?