Xerox Consultant Company Inc v. Marin General Hospital Corporation
Plaintiff: Xerox Consultant Company Inc
Defendant: Marin General Hospital Corporation
Case Number: 3:2012cv04948
Filed: September 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER re 68 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Xerox Consultant Company Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/23/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2014)
April 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE 63 . Discovery status conference set for 4/30/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Joint updated status statement due 4/28/2014. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/14/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)
February 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER (Denied without prejudice) re 49 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Request for Order Changing time to Continue Trial and Pre-Trial Dates; Joint Declaration; Proposed Order filed by Marin General Hospital Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/6/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 42 Stipulated Protective Order filed by Marin General Hospital Corporation, PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)
January 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 RE INTERIM STAY OF LITIGATION filed by Marin General Hospital Corporation, vacating 1/29/13 motion to dismiss, and resetting CMC to 3/14/13 at 9:00 a.m. Case Management Statement due by 3/7/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS filed by Xerox Consultant Company Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/13/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/23/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xerox Consultant Company Inc v. Marin General Hospital Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xerox Consultant Company Inc
Represented By: Arthur Jay Friedman
Represented By: Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson
Represented By: Scott A. Vignos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marin General Hospital Corporation
Represented By: Douglas C. Straus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?