Espinda v. Rosen et al
Plaintiff: David Espinda
Defendant: Alan B. Rosen, Steven Scott Loeb and Rosen & Loeb
Case Number: 4:2012cv05196
Filed: October 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION AND ALL PARTIES, WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 6, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER DENYING STIPULATION; REQUIRING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OR STIPULATED JUDGMENT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal filed by David Espinda. Stipulation for Dismissal or Stipulated Judgment due by 9/13/2013. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 9/18/2013 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 29, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OR STIPULATED JUDGMENT re 43 Notice of Settlement Agreement Entered by Parties filed by David Espinda, 44 Joint Case Management Statement filed by David Espinda. Stipulated Dismissal or Stipulated Judgement due by 7/26/2013. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 18, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)
April 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL re 32 Notice of Bifurcated Settlement filed by David Espinda. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 5, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)
December 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 11 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Espinda v. Rosen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Espinda
Represented By: Jessica Lynn Pascale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan B. Rosen
Represented By: Alan Lee Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Scott Loeb
Represented By: Alan Lee Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosen & Loeb
Represented By: Alan Lee Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?