Ruff v. Del Monte Corporation et al
Maxine S. Ruff |
Del Monte Corporation and Milo's Kitchen, LLC |
3:2012cv05251 |
October 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO TRANSFER, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/9/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013) |
Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING 38 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/2/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2013) |
Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION. Hearing on Motion to Consolidate set for 4/12/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/27/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013) |
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING SECOND UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY; DENYING AS MOOT FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/21/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2013) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING MOTION AND STIPULATION TO RELATE; DENYING MOTION TO STAY AND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/24/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.