Kane et al v. Delong et al
| Daniel J. Kane and Mesa Photonics, LLC |
| Kenneth W. Delong and Femtosoft Technologies |
| 4:2012cv05437 |
| October 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) filed by Daniel J. Kane, Mesa Photonics, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/6/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 23 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Amended Counterclaim and to Strike. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Femtosoft Technologies, Kenneth W. Delong. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/11/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 Stipulated Proposed Protective Order filed by Daniel J. Kane, Mesa Photonics, LLC, PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/4/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
18
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 1/9/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
