Eagleston v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company et al
| Richard A. Eagleston |
| The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Unum Group |
| 4:2012cv05633 |
| November 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/20/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2014)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DATE re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 2/26/2014. Case Management Conference set for 3/4/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/02/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 22 Case Management Statement. The Case Management Conference is rescheduled for 1/28/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. The Court emphasizes that the parties must complete the mediation prior to the Case Management Conference. No further extension will be permitted. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/25/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
