The Nanak Foundation Trust v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
| The Nanak Foundation Trust |
| GMAC Mortgage, LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association |
| 3:2012cv05647 |
| November 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL filed by GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Federal National Mortgage Association. OSC withdrawn. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/15/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013) Modified on 2/15/2013 (bpf, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY PHONE re 25 Declaration in Support, filed by The Nanak Foundation Trust. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/14/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/3/2013 01:30 PM. Plaintiff must file Show Cause Response due by 12/13/2012. Defendant may file Response to Plaintiff's brief by 12/20/2012. Plaintiff may file Reply brief by 12/27/2012. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/15/2012. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)
|
|
Filing
12
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/9/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
