Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al
Plaintiff: Alana Kaselitz and Melissa Kaselitz
Defendant: Hisoft Technology International, Ltd and Tiak Koon Loh
Case Number: 3:2012cv05760
Filed: November 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 CONSENT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGING SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS ALANA KASELITZ AND MELISSA KASELITZ ONLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 8, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2016)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CLARIFY ORDER AND JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL AWARD OF FEES AND COSTS; VACATING HEARING; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 66 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Hisoft Technology International, Ltd against Alana Kaselitz, Melissa Kaselitz. 1. Plaintiffs motion to vacate the arbitration award is hereby DENIED.2. Defendants motion to confirm the arbitration award is hereby GRANTED. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTIONS TO VACATE IN PART AND TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD. The deadline for the parties to file their respective reply briefs shall be February 3, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 15, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2016)
February 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT FURTHER STATUS REPORT. The parties are directed to file, no later than January 9, 2015, a Joint Further Status Report apprising the Court as to the status of the arbitration. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 14, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT FURTHER STATUS REPORT. The parties are directed to file, no later than February 14, 2014, a Joint Further Status Report apprising the Court as to the status of the arbitration. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 3, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST TIAK KOON LOH SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE; VACATING MAY 17, 2013 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than May 28, 2013, why plaintiffs' claims against Tiak Koon Loh should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 14, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2013)
February 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS; STAYING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. hiSoft Technology's motion to compel arbitration is granted, and p laintiffs' claims against hiSoft Technology are stayed pending completion of arbitration proceedings. Plaintiffs and hiSoft Technology are directed to file, no later than August 9, 2013, a Joint Status Report, apprising the Court of the status of the arbitration proceedings. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 15, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)
February 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 8, 2013 HEARING ON DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 6, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2013)
January 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is rescheduled for March 29, 2013. All deadlines based off the date of the initial case management conference are continued accordingly. The parties are directed to file a Joint Case Management Statement no later than March 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 30, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS. No later than January 18, 2013, plaintiffs shall file any surreply, not to exceed seven pages in length, exclusive of exhibits, and limited to the issue of hiSoft Technology's standing to enforce the arbitration provisions in the employment agreements. The hearing on hiSoft Technology's motion is hereby CONTINUED from January 18, 2013 to February 1, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 4, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2013)
December 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 14, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2012)
November 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT HISOFT TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CLAIMS. Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall be filed by December 7, 2012, and hiSoft's reply brief shall be filed by December 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 29, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaselitz et al v. Hisoft Technology International, Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alana Kaselitz
Represented By: Theodore Carl Lindquist, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Kaselitz
Represented By: Theodore Carl Lindquist, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hisoft Technology International, Ltd
Represented By: Matthew Kendall Edling
Represented By: Aron K. Liang
Represented By: Elizabeth Tran
Represented By: Steven Noel Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tiak Koon Loh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?