Architectural Resources Group, Inc. et al v. HKS, Inc.
Ideas Consulting, Inc. and Architectural Resources Group, Inc. |
HKS, Inc. |
3:2012cv05787 |
November 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Joseph C. Spero |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Entire action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/12/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013) |
Filing 66 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/20/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013) |
Filing 59 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 47 48 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/28/2013) |
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST THROUGH SIXTH CLAIMS OF COUNTER-COMPLAINT, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 28 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/13/2013) |
Filing 35 ORDER and Stipulation for Third-Party Defendants George Loisos's, Susan Ubbelohde's, and Tipping Mar + Associates's Responses to HKS, Inc.'s Third-Party Complaint. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/22/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013) |
Filing 34 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 18 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/22/2013) |
Filing 8 JUDGE ILLSTON'S STANDING ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.