Jimenez v. The Westin St. Francis Hotel et al
Andres Jimenez |
The Westin St. Francis Hotel, Bourbon Steak and Michael Judge |
3:2012cv06411 |
December 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING 32 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 11/6/2013. ***Civil Case Terminated.***(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2013) |
Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 30 Stipulation selecting Mediation (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013) |
Filing 28 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss; denying 18 Motion to Strike (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2013) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines Schedule filed by Andres Jimenez Case Management Conference set for 5/29/2013 03:15 PM. VIA TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/4/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013) |
Filing 7 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/26/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.