Crockett v. Rash Curtis & Associates
| Diana Crockett |
| Rash Curtis & Associates |
| 5:2012cv06429 |
| December 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 30 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2013)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT. All deadlines remain active until a dismissal is filed. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/21/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2013)
|
|
Filing
24
AMENDED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING [re 23 Order on Motion to Dismiss]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/14/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2013)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Hon. William Alsup [denying 17 Motion to Appear by Telephone].(whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING by Hon. William Alsup denying 10 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013)
|
|
Filing
12
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 11 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
