Machado et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
| Oscar Machado and Sandra I. Garcia |
| Greg Lewis, Matthew Cate and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) |
| 3:2012cv06501 |
| December 21, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 1: Case Management Statement due by 1/29/2015. Discovery due by 2/27/2015. Expert discovery due by 5/8/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2015 01:30 PM. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/30/2015 02: 00 PM. Jury Selection / Jury Trial (10 days) set for 8/10/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley.. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 8/5/2014. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2014)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Re. Dkt No. 59 by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion to Dismiss as follows: The motion is DENIED as to the claims against Defendant C hernow; The motion is GRANTED with prejudice as to Plaintiff Garcia's state law claims; The motion is GRANTED as to the claims against Defendant Nguyen and the Doe defendants with 20 days leave to amend; and The motion is granted as to Plaintiffs' request for attorneys fees under California Civil Code Sections 51 or 52.1. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2014)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 56 Request to Appear Telephonically filed by Sandra I. Garcia, Oscar Machado. Counsel shall contact Court Call at 1-888-882-6878 to make the arrangements to appear by telephone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/16/2014. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 31 Motion to Dismiss (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Request to Appear Telephonically filed by Sandra I. Garcia, Oscar Machado. Counsel shall contact Court Call at 1-888-882-6878 to make the arrangements to appear by telephone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/24/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
27
Amended ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 25 Stipulation Changing Time for Exchanging Initial Disclosures and Case Management Conference Scheduled for July 11, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/3/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
21
AMENDED ORDER DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/1/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2013)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/1/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2013)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/9/2013 at 01:30 PM, Courtroom F, 15th Floor in San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Show Cause Response due by 5/2/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 4/23/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
