Zacharias v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Reyna U. Zacharias |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 3:2012cv06525 |
| December 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Samuel Conti |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Request to Appear Telephonically at the Case Management Hearing. This Court does not permit appearances by telephone. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 10/24/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
49
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to Dismiss.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
|
|
Filing
38
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 06/18/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)
|
|
Filing
29
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 3 , 20 Motion to Dismiss.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting 18 Stipulation Extending Plaintiff's time to resond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to 1/11/13. Defendant has to 1/18/13 to reply. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 1/10/13. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
