v. Lee
Movant: Khaled Ahmad Shaker Abu-Keshek
Case Number: 3:2012mc80276
Filed: November 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Khaled Ahmad Shaker Abu-Keshek. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on December 14, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2012)
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH RE 4 MOTION to Quash Subpoena. Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2012 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on December 13, 2012. Counsel that wish to appear by phone shall contact Court Call at 888-882-6878 to make the arrangements. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: v. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Khaled Ahmad Shaker Abu-Keshek
Represented By: Stacey L. Gartland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?