Kavalan v. Clark et al
| Isaac Kavalan |
| Thomas J. Nixon and Nikki Clark |
| 3:2013cv00162 |
| January 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/3/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER DENYING 44 Ex Parte Application to Vacate the Order and Judgment of Dismissal or, in the Alternative for Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 41 Ex Parte Application to Vacate the Order and Judgment of Dismissal or, in the Alternative, for Leave to Amend, and Instructions to Clerk. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 30, 2013. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DIRECTING UNITED STATES MARSHAL TO SERVE; VACATING SCHEDULING ORDER DATED JANUARY 11, 2013; AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Statement due by 4/19/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/26/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/13/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
