King v. Hausfeld et al
| Jon T. King |
| Hausfeld LLP and Michael D. Hausfeld |
| 4:2013cv00237 |
| January 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 7 Motion to Dismiss (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 4 ADR Scheduling Order filed by Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP Case Management Conference reset for 5/30/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/8/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER re 24 Objection filed by Jon T. King. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/26/13. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge 2/15/2013 Denying as Moot 5 Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Temporarily Seal Complaint. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER re 5 Ex Parte Application filed by Michael D. Hausfeld, Hausfeld LLP. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/4/13. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
16
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/1/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
