Copytele, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Copytele, Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation America, E Ink Holdings, Inc., E Ink Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation
Case Number: 3:2013cv00380
Filed: January 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 108 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 107 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Copytele, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/6/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)
December 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 105 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Copytele, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/4/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)
May 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 103 STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting CMC from 5/15/14 to 12/11/14. Case Management Statement due by 12/4/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/11/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/8/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2014)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 101 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 100 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Further Case Management Conference filed by E Ink Holdings, Inc., E Ink Corporation Case Management Statement due by 5/8/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/15/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/17/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 97 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Copytele, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 4/17/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/24/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/11/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 95 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Copytele, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 2/13/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/20/2014 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on November 12, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2013)
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Conditionally Granting 52 Defendant E Ink's Motion to Stay, and Deferring Ruling on 50 Defendant E Ink's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 54 MOTION to Stay Public Version Defendant AU Optronics Corporations Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Litigation and Compel Arbitration Stipulation and Proposed Order Withdrawing Motion To Co mpel filed by Copytele, Inc., Motions terminated: 54 MOTION to Stay Public Version Defendant AU Optronics Corporations Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Litigation and Compel Arbitration Stipulation and Proposed Order Withdrawing Motion To Compel filed by Copytele, Inc.,. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 6/27/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting in part and denying in part 53 Defendant AUO's Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 59 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 58 TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TO STAY, AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION filed by Copytele, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 58 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS, TO STAY, AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, 54 MOTION to Stay Public Version Defendant AU Optronics Corporations Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay Litigation and Compe l Arbitration, 50 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Copytele, Inc.'s Complaint; Memorandum of Points and authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss; Notice of Motion; [Proposed] Order, 52 MOTION to Stay re 1 Complaint, DEFENDANTS E INK HOLDINGS, INC. AND E INK CORPORATION'S MOTION, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY CLAIMS PENDING ARBITRATION BETWEEN PLAINTIFF COPYTELE, INC. AND DEFENDANT AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION. Responses due by 5/20/2013. Replies due by 6/3/2 013. Motion Hearing set for 6/27/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 6/20/2013. Case Management Conference reset for 6/27/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/6/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 CONTINUING THE MAY 9 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JUNE 6, 2013 filed by E Ink Holdings, Inc., E Ink Corporation Case Management Statement due by 5/30/2013. Case Management Conference set for 6/6/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/22/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/13/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Copytele, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Copytele, Inc.
Represented By: David Taylor Rudolph
Represented By: Eric B. Fastiff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation America
Represented By: Casey Richard O'Connor
Represented By: Matthew Rawlinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E Ink Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E Ink Corporation
Represented By: Beatrice B. Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?