Bartelt v. Affymax, Inc. et al
Tricia M. Bartelt |
Affymax, Inc., John A. Orwin, Herbert C. Cross, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. |
3:2013cv01025 |
March 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Susan Illston |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 86 Motion for Settlement. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2014) |
Filing 88 ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL BRIEFING IN RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS TO APPROVAL OF FINAL SETTLEMENT - The final fairness hearing will be conducted on December 10, 2014, starting at 1:45 p.m. By 5:00 p.m. on Monday, December 8, 2014, Lead Counsel shall f ile a statement, not to exceed six pages, addressing the issues raised in 85 Objection. Affymax need not file a response; it may join Lead Counsel's statement or, if it wishes, file its own six-page statement by December 8, 2014. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/03/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2014) |
Filing 73 ORDER extending stay re 72 Status Report. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/23/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014) |
Filing 71 ORDER Extending Stay re 70 Status Report. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/22/2014. The Court hereby extends the stay in the Consolidated Action to June 20, 2014. If the motion for preliminary approval is not on file on or before June 20, 2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2014) |
Filing 65 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 47 MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT by Hon. William H. Orrick. The defendants' motion is GRANTED regarding Count I (violations of Section 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b5) against individual defendants Cross, Duliege, and Knapp. The motion is GRANTED regarding Count I (violations of Section 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b5) against Affymax and individual defendant Orwin based on the August 2012 and November 2012 statements. The motion is GRANTED regarding Count II (violation of Section 20(a)) against all defendants. The Consolidated Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with regard to the claims identified above. Any amended complaint shall be filed within 30 days of this Order. The motion is DENIED regarding Count I (violations of Section 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b5) against Affymax and individual defendant Orwin based only on the February 12, 2013 statements regarding the safety of Omontys. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2014) |
Filing 63 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 62 STIPULATION. Case Management Conference is hereby taken off-calendar, to be rescheduled, if necessary, following the lifting of the discovery stay. No Case Management Statement is currently due. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/24/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2013) |
Filing 33 ORDER re 31 Response ( Non Motion ), filed by Tommy Jay Carter. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/10/2013. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2013) |
Filing 28 ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 5/6/2013. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.