Heatherly et al v. Bistro 29 et al
Plaintiff: Daren Heatherly and Irma Ramirez
Defendant: Steven N. Ledson, Department 29, Inc and Bistro 29
Case Number: 3:2013cv01132
Filed: March 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 44 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 9/3/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 35 ; ORDER CONTINUING Case Management Conference to 9/3/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 24 . Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/11/2014. Case Management Conference set for 6/18/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/19/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FINDING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SATISFIED 12 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 6/11/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN. Plaintiffs must either satisfy Rule 15(a)(2)or show cause in writing why second amended complaint should not be stricken within 14 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/23/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heatherly et al v. Bistro 29 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daren Heatherly
Represented By: George Salah Khoury
Represented By: Thomas E. Frankovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irma Ramirez
Represented By: George Salah Khoury
Represented By: Thomas E. Frankovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven N. Ledson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department 29, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bistro 29
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?