Do v. Hollins Law, P.C.
Plaintiff: Vien Do
Defendant: Hollins Law, P.C.
Case Number: 3:2013cv01322
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S. White
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/1/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
September 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING 54 STIPULATION selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/24/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2013)
August 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 8/23/2013. Case Management Conference set for 8/30/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/5/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION TO DIMISS; DENYING OBJECTIONS TO REPLY; AND DENYING AS MOOT SECOND MOTION TO APPEAR BY PHONE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/18/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER DENYING 20 Motion to Transfer Case. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 12, 2013. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013)
June 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE REPLY BRIEF. Replies due by 3:00 p.m. on 6/25/2013.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/20/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS AND DENYING MOTIONS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE WITHOUT PREJUDICE: as to 20 MOTION to Transfer Case; AND 24 First MOTION to Dismiss : Motion Hearing set for 7/26/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/17/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2013)
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/12/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2013)
May 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO CLARIFY STATUS OF 20 Motion to Transfer Case. Joint Status Report due by 2:00 p.m. on May 22, 2013. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on May 21, 2013. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2013)
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE MOTION TO TRANSFER. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 4/26/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Do v. Hollins Law, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vien Do
Represented By: Ryan Scott Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hollins Law, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?