Gitson et al v. Trader Joe's Company
| Amy Gitson, Christine Vodicka and Deborah Ross |
| Trader Joe's Company |
| 3:2013cv01333 |
| March 25, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William Alsup |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 125 Stipulation Modification of Briefing Schedule for Defendant Trader Joe's Company's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER GRANTING re 118 Joint Status Report Regarding Scheduling of Mandatory Settlement Conference filed by Trader Joe's Company. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/7/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2015)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER GRANTING re 114 Joint Status Report re: Scheduling of Mandatory Settlement Conference filed by Trader Joe's Company. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/3/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)
|
|
Filing
113
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 112 Stipulation to Extend Stay and Continue Case Management Conference.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2015)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER GRANTING re 107 Joint Status Report re: Scheduling of Mandatory Settlement Conference filed by Trader Joe's Company. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/17/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2014)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING re 102 Joint Status Report Re: Scheduling of Settlement Conference filed by Trader Joe's Company. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/2/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria denying 74 Motion for Interlocutory Appeal; granting 74 Motion to Stay; denying 82 Motion to Dismiss; denying 82 Motion to Strike and Setting the Matter for a CMC on 11/4/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014)
|
|
Filing
99
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE 82 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Strike 76 Amended Complaint , 74 MOTION to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal re 68 Order on Motion to Dismiss,, and MOTION to Stay . Motion Hearing set for 8/7/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/17/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER directing parties to file supplemental briefs by June 2, 2014 and rescheduling hearing to June 26, 2014. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/19/14. (vclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2014)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS by Hon. William H. Orrick granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion to Dismiss. The motion to dismiss is DENIED on the first through sixth causes of action for violations of the UCL, FAL, and CLRA on claims regard ing the ECJ Products. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND on the first through sixth causes of action on claims regarding the Soy Milk Products and the Undisclosed Additives Products. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this Order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
61
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re 58 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 8/26/2014. Case Management Conference set for 9/2/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Dis covery cutoff: 10/10/2014. Dispositive motions to be heard by 12/17/2014. Pretrial Conference set for 3/2/2015 02:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 3/23/2015 08:30 AM, both in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/06/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS 35 MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE by Judge William H. Orrick. The motion to dismiss is DENIED as to the plaintiffs' first cause of action to the extent that it is pr edicated on violations of the Sherman Law. The plaintiffs' second through sixth causes of action under the UCL, FAL and CLRA are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The plaintiffs' seventh cause of action for restitution is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Paragraphs 58-67 of the FAC are ordered stricken. The plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within 20 days of this Order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE re 35 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Trader Joe's Company. The hearing noticed for September 18, 2013, is VACATED. The motion will be taken under submission and decided on the papers. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/17/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Request For Order Changing Time Relating To Defendant's Motion To Dismiss and, in the Alternative, Motion To Strike and Request for Judicial Notice Response/Opposition to motion due b y 8/16/2013. Reply due by 8/30/2013. Motion Hearing on 35 Motion to Dismiss set for 9/18/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/29/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Hon. William Alsup denying 19 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)
|
|
Filing
15
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 14 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/13. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
