Copper Hill, Inc. v. Pagtalunan et al
| Copper Hill, Inc. |
| Renato Pagtalunan and Janette R. Cabauatan |
| 3:2013cv01345 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER (1) CONTINUING CMC AND (2) TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO FILE JOINT CMC STATEMENT. The court CONTINUES the case management conference from Thursday, July 25, 2013, to Thursday, August 22, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Furthermore, the court ORDERS the parties' counsel to show cause why they should not be sanctioned for their failure to file a joint case management statement before either of t he previously scheduled case management conferences. The parties' counsel shall do so by filing a written explanation no later than August 1, 2013. Show Cause Response due by 8/1/2013. Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/22/2013 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/24/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
