Collins v. City of Oakland et al
Clayton Collins |
Antonio Acosta, Leo Bazile, County of Alameda, City of Oakland and Rick Cocanour |
3:2013cv01493 |
April 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Laurel Beeler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER (1) DIRECTING THE U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE OFFICER COCANOUR AND (2) CONTINUING THE HEARING ON 11 12 55 DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS. The hearing on defendants' pending motions to dismiss remains is CONTINUED from December 19, 2013 to February 6, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. Signed by Magistrate Judge Larurel Beeler on 11/13/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2013) |
Filing 53 ORDER (1) DIRECTING MR. BAZILE AND MR. ACOSTA TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO MR. COLLINS'S COMPLAINT AND (2) REGARDING THE SERVICE OF OFFICER COCANOUR. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/18/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2013) |
Filing 43 ORDER (1) REGARDING THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND (2) CONTINUING THE HEARING ON THE ENTITY DEFENDANTS' PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Although the court appreciates that this action has been delayed, given the situatio n with the individual defendants' legal representation and the court's need for the consent of all defendants, the court CONTINUES the hearing on the entity defendants' pending motions to dismiss from October 17, 2013 to 11:00 a.m. on December 19, 2013 in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102. The court also ORDERS the City of Oakland to file a status update about the individual defendants' legal representation by October 25, 2013. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/4/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013) |
Filing 40 ORDER REGARDING THE REPRESENTATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS. The court ORDERS counsel for the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda to tell the court whether they also represent, or intend to represent, any of the individual defendants to this action. Counsel for the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda shall do so by filing short statements on the court's Electronic Case File by 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 3, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/1/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013) |
Filing 30 ORDER (1) directing the United States Marshal to serve Leo Bazile and Antonio Acosta and (2) CONTINUING the hearing on the entity defendants' motions to dismiss. The court CONTINUES the hearing on the City of Oakland's and the County of Alameda's motions to dismiss to October 17, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/20/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013) |
Filing 27 ORDER (1) REGARDING 26 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO 11 THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) CONTINUING THE HEARING ON 11 12 DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS to September 19, 2013. See order for details. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/8/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.