Perkinelmer, Inc. et al v. Bruker Corporation
| Xenogen Corporation, Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Perkinelmer, Inc. and Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. |
| Bruker Corporation |
| 4:2013cv01602 |
| April 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 30, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 17, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Initial Case Management Conference is rescheduled from July 12, 2013 to September 13, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 2, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PATRICK J. O'SHEA PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 20, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
