Stahl Law Firm et al v. Judicate West et al
Stahl Law Firm and Norbert Stahl |
Vincent P. Difiglia and Judicate West |
4:2013cv01668 |
April 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Mateo |
Donna M. Ryu |
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 Order Denying Defendant Di Figlia's 67 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/27/14. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2014) |
Filing 74 ORDER Requesting Clarification RE 67 Defendant Di Figlia's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/10/14. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014) |
Filing 70 ORDER Granting 60 61 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/27/13. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2013) |
Filing 56 ORDER Dismissing Case for Lack of Standing. Amended complaint, if any, due by 10/10/13. Motions terminated: 33 MOTION to Dismiss and 35 MOTION to Dismiss. Case Management Statement due by 10/28/2013. Case Management Conference set for 11/4/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/12/2013. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013) |
Filing 53 ORDER TO PRO TEM REPORTER TO PRODUCE TRANSCRIPT. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/27/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.