Allen v. AVT Event Technologies, Inc. et al
Rodney Allen |
AVT Event Technologies, Inc. and Hyatt Regency |
3:2013cv01922 |
April 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS' JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 21, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2013) |
Filing 30 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 7/29/13. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013) |
Filing 22 ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. The parties are referred to mediation. The deadline to complete mediation is 90 days from the date of this order, good cause for the requested additional 60 days not having been shown. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 28, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013) |
Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT AVT'S ANSWER; AFFORDING AVT LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER; VACATING HEARING. To the extent the motion seeks an order striking the "Affirmative De fenses" section of AVT's answer, the motion is granted. In all other respects, the motion is denied. AVT's amended answer, if any, shall be filed no later than July 3, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 20, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.