CareFusion 202, Inc. v. Tres Tech Corporation
CareFusion 202, Inc. |
Tres Tech Corporation |
3:2013cv02194 |
May 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Diego |
Edward M. Chen |
Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 52 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by CareFusion 202, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/3/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2014) |
Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Third Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Continue Case Management Conference [Civil L.R. 6-2, 7-12] filed by CareFusion 202, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 8/28/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2014) |
Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Tres Tech Corporation Case Management Statement due by 5/29/2014. Case Management Conference set for 6/5/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/13/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014) |
Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 27 Motion to Stay. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013) |
Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CASE IN FAVOR OF TEXAS ACTION filed by CareFusion 202, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO EXTEND DATE OF HEARING OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY CASE IN FAVOR OF TEXAS ACTION. Motion Hearing set for 8/1/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/24/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013) |
Filing 32 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 25 Respondent's Administrative Motion to Stay Briefing (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2013) |
Filing 24 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 13 Petitioner's Emergency Ex Parte Application for Order Temporarily Staying Respondents From Further Proceedings. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/20/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CareFusion 202, Inc. v. Tres Tech Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CareFusion 202, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Howard Neil Wisnia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tres Tech Corporation | |
Represented By: | Paul Talmage Boston |
Represented By: | Joseph A. Greco |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Allen Tinker |
Represented By: | Elisabeth Ann Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.