United States Small Business Administration v. Bensal et al
United States Small Business Administration |
Susan J. Bensal, Michael D. Bensal, Michael Edward Bensal and Sophia Bensal |
3:2013cv02263 |
May 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Jeffrey S. White |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/10/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014) |
Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING 28 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING 30 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge William H. Orrick. The transfer of the trust share pursuant to Bensal's disclaimer is VOID. Defendants are ORDERED to transfer all property representing Bensal's trust share to the SBA in satisfaction of the portion of the default judgment relating to the second loan. Defendants may not otherwise dispose of the trust share. A lien is imposed on all property representing Bensal's trust share. The SBA shall submit a proposed judgment to the defendants for agreement within five (5) days of this order. If the parties cannot agree upon the proposed judgment, they are directed to submit competing proposals within ten (10) days of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.