Glimidakas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Nikos Glimidakas |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank, N.A. |
3:2013cv02484 |
June 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Samuel Conti |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS, Motions terminated: 8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by U.S. Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/01/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2013) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER Staying Proceedings. Case stayed until October 16, 2013. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Responses due by 10/22/2013. Replies due by 10/29/2013. Motion Hearing set for 11/22/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 06/26/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013) |
Filing 16 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Richard Seeborg. Hon. Charles R. Breyer no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/13/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013) |
Filing 13 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/11/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.