Greene v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
| Rosemary Greene |
| Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and ETS Services, LLC |
| 3:2013cv02774 |
| June 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| William Alsup |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/9/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William Alsup [granting 9 Motion to Amend/Correct ; Plaintiff is required to E-FILE the amended document]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE [re 21 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Rosemary Greene]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/20/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
19
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 18 Clerks Notice, Terminate Hearings. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/26/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
