Sepehry-Fard v. MB Financial Services
| Fareed Sepehry-Fard |
| MB Financial Services |
| 3:2013cv02784 |
| June 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3545 Action to Recovery Money |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER GRANTING, WITH PREJUDICE, 110 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING 112 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 3/2/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/19/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/5/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2015)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER Submitting 95 , 97 , 98 Motions Without Oral Argument; Vacating Hearing; Continuing Case Management Conference; and Denying 104 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/21/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER GRANTING 66 MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; STRIKING 84 PLAINTIFF'S MAY 21, 2014 MOTION. The motion hearing set for June 5, 2014 is hereby VACATED. Plaintiff shall have until June 13, 2014 to file an amended complaint. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 5/23/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
76
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Motion to Dismiss set for 06/05/2014 at 9:00 AM. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2014 01:30 PM. Jury Selection set for 4/6/2015 09:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 4/6/2015 09:00 AM. Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions 01/19/2015. Hearing for Motions in Limine set for 03/19/2015 at 2:30 PM. Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2015 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 05/09/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
69
Discovery Order re: Docket No. 63. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on March 14, 2014. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
62
Order Re Discovery Meet and Confer Procedure. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on January 23, 2014. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Civil Standing hearing Set at 1:30 pm. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013) Modified on 6/21/2013 (hdjS, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sepehry-Fard v. MB Financial Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fareed Sepehry-Fard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MB Financial Services | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
