Sawhney et al v. Amco Insurance Company
| RMHNS, Inc. and Meenakashi Sawhney |
| Amco Insurance Company |
| 3:2013cv04210 |
| September 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/2/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
24
STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/31/2014 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2014. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/27/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)
|
|
Filing
19
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2014 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 12/8/2014 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 12/8/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/12/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Richard Seeborg. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/17/13. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
