Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tayler Bayer
Defendant: Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv04487
Filed: September 27, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 119 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 6/19/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2019)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 110 FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 4/10/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2019)
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 86 Motion for Reconsideration. Case Management Statement due by 8/9/2018. Case Management Conference set for 8/16/2016 10:00 AM. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018)
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 28 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Status Conference set for 6/14/2018 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018)
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James re: 69 MOTION Effect of Ninth Circuit Decision on The Remaining Relief Available. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2018)
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 28 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 34 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2015)
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER VACATING PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/15/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER VACATING HEARING re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Tayler Bayer, 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/2/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2014)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY PHONE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 1/13/2014. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2014)
December 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION BY 12/26/2013. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/13/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tayler Bayer
Represented By: Keith A. Ehrman
Represented By: Cliff Michael Palefsky
Represented By: Michael Rubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?