Bailey v. California State Prison Corcoran
| Larry Bailey |
| California State Prison Corcoran, CDCR California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Wasco State Prison, Los Angeles County Jail and Los Angeles Police Department |
| 3:2013cv04967 |
| October 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Kings |
| PSLC MWD |
| William H. Orrick |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER REOPENING ACTION; ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/12/2013. The action is REOPENED, and the Clerk shall amend thedocket accordingly. The judgment (Docket No. 9) and the order of dismissal (Docket No. 8) are VACATED. This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of California. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to respond to the Courts order, and for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/06/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2013)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/5/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
