Nobles et al v. Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc et al
Plaintiff: Ayanna Nobles and Julia Hughes
Defendant: Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc and Coco-Cola Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv05017
Filed: October 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/14/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 12/11/2015. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/24/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2015)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MDL ORDER 2535. Signed by Clerk of Panel, Jeffrey N. Luthi on 3/24/2014. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)
February 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING 20 STIPULATION Continuing the Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 4/11/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2014 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/13/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2014)
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, Motions terminated: 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint and Requesting Continuance of Initial Case Management Conference filed by Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc, Coco-Cola Company. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/5/14 is continued to 3/21/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/19/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Judge Illston's Standing ORDER (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nobles et al v. Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ayanna Nobles
Represented By: Sydney Jay Hall
Represented By: Reginald Von Terrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julia Hughes
Represented By: Sydney Jay Hall
Represented By: Reginald Von Terrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coco-Cola Refreshments USA Inc
Represented By: Tammy Beth Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coco-Cola Company
Represented By: Tammy Beth Webb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?