Malem Medical, LTD. et al v. Theos Medical Systems, Inc. et al
| Malem Medical, LTD. and Enuresis Associates, LLC |
| Theos Medical Systems, Inc. and Saket Bhatia |
| 4:2013cv05236 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Outside US |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 17-CV-5660. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/20/18. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2018)
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 170 Defendants' Motion for an Order to Show Cause Re Contempt and to Reopen Discovery. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2018)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part 143 Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017)
|
|
Filing
118
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 117 FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATIONAND/OR TRADE SECRETS filed by Theos Medical Systems, Inc., Saket Bhatia. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/30/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2017)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER - CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/14/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)
|
|
Filing
70
NOTICE of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Settlement Conference set for 3/23/2015 at 1:15 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER re 63 MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Theos Medical Systems, Inc., Saket Bhatia. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 56 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2015)
|
|
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE filed by Theos Medical Systems, Inc., Saket Bhatia. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/8/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 36 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses in Defendants' Answer or, in the Alternative, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING ADR DEADLINE AND RESETTING CMC re 38 Stipulation filed by Theos Medical Systems, Inc., Saket Bhatia Case Management Statement due by 10/2/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/9/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/27/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM filed by Theos Medical Systems, Inc., Saket Bhatia. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/24/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2014)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 MOTION to Amend/Correct Stipulation and Proposed Order filed by Enuresis Associates, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/9/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
16
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/10/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
