Hanson v. Pro Solutions
Gena Hanson |
Pro Solutions |
4:2013cv05377 |
November 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Maria-Elena James |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CLASS NOTICE DEADLINES AND MOVE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING. Final Approval Hearing previously set for 2/23/2017 Continued to 4/27/2017 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/20/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2016) Modified on 12/20/2016 (cl, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 80 ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT. Final Approval Hearing set for 2/23/2017 at 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/18/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2016) |
Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER Re 51 To Extend The Deadline For The Designation Of Experts. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/28/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2015) |
Filing 50 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE BY 45 DAYS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/31/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2015) |
Filing 48 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/4/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2015) |
Filing 46 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/13/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2015) |
Filing 41 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, Case referred to Private ADR. Motion for Class Certification Hearing set for 8/6/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/24/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2014) |
Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 25 Second Motion to Dismiss. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014) |
Filing 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT MAY RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/1/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014) |
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 12 motion to dismiss in part with leave to amend. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2014) |
Filing 8 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Richard Seeborg. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/19/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hanson v. Pro Solutions | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pro Solutions | |
Represented By: | Stephen H. Turner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gena Hanson | |
Represented By: | Justin Theodore Berger |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Scott Letcher |
Represented By: | Niall Padraic McCarthy |
Represented By: | Anne Marie Murphy |
Represented By: | Noah Zinner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.