Nazif v. Computer Sciences Corporation
Plaintiff: Fred Nazif
Defendant: Computer Sciences Corporation
Case Number: 3:2013cv05498
Filed: November 27, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER REGARDING PENDING MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/22/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015)
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen (1) Granting 71 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) Denying as Moot 67 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and Denying as Moot 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2015)
May 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERENCE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/6/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2015)
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER RE: SEALING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/4/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2015)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Conduct Depositions Out of Time filed by Computer Sciences Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/24/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 46 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/6/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2015)
October 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 Allowing Counsel to Appear at Status Conference by Phone filed by Computer Sciences Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/2/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Computer Sciences Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/30/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2014)
March 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to File Amended Complaint filed by Fred Nazif. Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/13/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/16/13. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nazif v. Computer Sciences Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Nazif
Represented By: Christopher Robert Le Clerc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Computer Sciences Corporation
Represented By: Rebecca Kim Kimura
Represented By: Susan Tayeko Kumagai
Represented By: Stephen Lee Scott
Represented By: Frank Daniel Wood, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?