Burgess et al v. Otto Bock Healthcare et al
| William Everden and Reginald Burgess |
| Integrated Health Holdings Inc, HealthNet of California, Trulife Inc, Fillauer Group, Ossur America, Endolite America, Otto Bock Healthcare, Norm's Restaurants Inc, EBAY,Inc., Paypal Inc and AliExpress |
| 3:2014cv00302 |
| January 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Orange |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER GRANTING 93 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Reginald Burgess, William Everden. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/25/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2014)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING 45 Notice of Substitution of Counsel as to Paypal Inc, EBAY,Inc. filed by Paypal Inc, EBAY,Inc. Attorney Ryan David Marsh terminated Paypal Inc, EBAY,Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/4/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER RE: 3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. The court orders that Everden either file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee on or before 3/3/2014. The motion filed 2/17/2014 17 is TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/25/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
