Khalji v. Deloitte & Touche LLP et al
Nazir Khalji |
Gareth Davies and Deloitte & Touche LLP |
4:2014cv00568 |
February 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
William H. Orrick |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/24/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2014) |
Filing 46 ORDER RE JURISDICTION AND PENDING MOTIONS - This action will be dismissed without prejudice on 8/27/2014, unless before that date plaintiff files an amended complaint that drops non-diverse defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/15/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2014) |
Filing 39 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The defendant may file a three-page brief explaining why the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction by 8/8/2014. The plaintiff may file a three-page brief showing cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of subj ect matter jurisdiction by 8/13/2014. The issue of subject matter jurisdiction will be heard 8/27/2014 02:00 PM at the same time as the originally scheduled hearing for the defendant's motions to transfer venue and to dismiss. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/06/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2014) |
Filing 32 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/17/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.