Silver v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
| Neil Silver |
| Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency |
| 3:2014cv00652 |
| February 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Marin |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2020)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER DENYING 85 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND TERMINATING 84 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DECERTIFY AS MOOT by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2020)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER re defendant's motion for summary judgment 67 by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2018)
|
|
Filing
52
Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment.(pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER relating cases. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/2/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 24 Motion to Stay (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER staying briefing schedule on motion to certify class. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/18/2014. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
